The interpenetration of branches of law and the influence of Anglo-Saxon culture on code law countries are phenomena that have been observed for decades. Public law, the goals and tasks of its subjects, and the actions of private law subjects, in fact, interpenetrate, complement and mutually support each other wherever they serve the effective implementation of the tasks of the state, the law, ensuring the real freedom of the individual and his/her security. This is due to the essence of the democratic rule of law, the very idea of the state, law, justice and personalism. However, whenever these values may be shaken, the interest of the subject may be threatened or violated, the state must guarantee the right to a court – an independent body, an impartial judge who will impose and enforce the obligation to obey the law. The judicial power, executing and applying the laws enacted by the Sovereign, in accordance with the Constitution, has the monopoly of administering justice. Any activity by private parties that seeks to settle a case amicably is valuable and should be encouraged, but it cannot exclude the protective role of the right to a court of law, including the fair hearing of a case by a legitimate body applying predictable, accountable (codified) law. Judicial power is intended to protect weaker actors from violence (not only by the state, but also by „stronger” actors, although theoretically „equal”). At all times, we should find an answer to the question of how much law is to be a set of orderly, accountable, predictable rules forming a „system”, even somewhat archaic – and how much is a reactive, depending on needs and situations, mix of tools and procedures, used „flexibly” by various entities, ensuring the realization of the goals not so much of law, but of the „queen of sciences” – statistics. The right to a court of law cannot be relinquished, as its guarantee character would become an illusion.