We discussed and summarized the latest data from the global literature on the action of polyphenolic antioxidants and their metal complexes. The review also includes a summary of the outcomes of theoretical computations and our many years of experimental experience. We employed various methods, including spectroscopy (FT-IR, FT-Raman, NMR, UV/Vis), X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, quantum calculations, and biological assays (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity tests). According to our research, the number and position of hydroxyl groups in aromatic rings, as well as the delocalization of electron charge and conjugated double bonds, have a major impact on the antioxidant effectiveness of the studied compounds. Another important factor is metal complexation, whereby high ionic potential metals (e.g., Fe(III), Cr(III), Cu(II)) enhance antioxidant properties by stabilizing electron charge, while the low ionic potential metals (e.g., Ag(I), Hg(II), Pb(II)) reduce efficacy by disrupting electron distribution. However, we observed no simple correlation between ionic potential and antioxidant capacity. This paper gives insights that will aid in identifying new, effective antioxidants, which are vital for nutrition and the prevention of neurodegenerative illnesses. Our results outline the connections between biological activity and molecular structure, offering a foundation for the methodical design of antioxidants. Our review also shows in detail how we use various complementary methods to assess the impact of metals on the electronic systems of ligands. This approach moves beyond the traditional “trial and error” method, allowing for the more efficient and rational development of future antioxidants