This article examines the relationship between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign narratives and the underlying economic realities they portray. Focusing on three campaign cycles from 2016, 2020 to 2024, the study juxtaposes Trump’s audiovisual messaging on job outsourcing, reshoring, and economic decline with empirical data on employment trends, trade policy outcomes, and macroeconomic indicators. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and peer-reviewed economic research, the article evaluates the extent to which Trump’s claims align with measurable economic outcomes. The analysis finds that while Trump successfully mobilized public concern around outsourcing and industrial decline, much of the job loss predated his political rise, and economic recovery narratives often overlooked the role of bipartisan stimulus and global trends. The study further contrasts Trump’s criticism of "Bidenomics" with the post-2021 resurgence of domestic manufacturing investment driven by targeted industrial policy. Integrating campaign communication theory with economic analysis, this research contributes to understanding how populist narratives intersect with data-driven policy realities.